In a world saturated with digitally altered photographs, the strain to evolve to manufactured requirements of magnificence is relentless. The pursuit of magnificence has arguably developed from a private alternative right into a pervasive social and financial crucial.

The worldwide magnificence trade, projected to generate almost $140 billion by 2030, thrives on this crucial, advertising not simply merchandise, however a super. But, behind the shiny packaging lies a profound and little-examined ecological and human price. A important examination of the prolonged, typically incomprehensible ingredient lists on our beauty merchandise reveals a narrative that’s removed from stunning – each in what’s listed and in what will not be.

The unglamorous story of mica

Mica, a chemically secure, heat-resistant silicate mineral, is the ingredient that provides shimmer to eyeshadows, lipsticks, and foundations. India is likely one of the world’s largest producers, with a good portion of its mining concentrated within the forested areas of Jharkhand and Bihar. A substantial portion of India’s mica manufacturing is sourced from unlawful mines.

The human price is extreme. In these unregulated ‘rat-hole’ mines, employees, together with younger kids, scavenge for mica with out protecting gear, uncovered to mud that may result in extreme lung ailments. Regardless of mica extraction being banned since 1980, unlawful mining persists to today.

In response to mounting scrutiny, the cosmetics trade has tried reform. The Accountable Mica Initiative (RMI), a coalition of firms and NGOs, was shaped in 2017 with the purpose of eradicating youngster labour from the Indian mica provide chain by 2022. Nonetheless, RMI’s most up-to-date annual report estimates that about 10% of India’s mica mining workforce nonetheless contains kids as of 2024, and the purpose of kid labour eradication has been delayed to 2030.

Few firms, equivalent to L’Oréal and Estée Lauder, declare to stick to moral sourcing practices that respect labour rights, and others, like Lush, have shifted to artificial mica. Nonetheless, these partial options fall brief. Artificial mica has its personal ecological footprint, requiring an energy-intensive manufacturing course of. As quite a few investigations have concluded, the core drawback stays: a provide chain the place the extraordinary strain for low-cost uncooked supplies continues to overshadow human dignity and environmental integrity.

The unlabelled risk of ‘ceaselessly chemical compounds’

Whereas mica is often listed upfront on product labels, a extra insidious risk emerges from what will not be.

This risk comes from an unlimited household of over 14,000 artificial chemical compounds often known as polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS – typically referred to as ‘ceaselessly chemical compounds.’ Prized for his or her extraordinary stability, these chemical compounds have been utilized in cosmetics to create merchandise which are waterproof, long-lasting, and smudge-proof. Their defining chemical characteristic is an exceptionally sturdy carbon-fluorine bond, which makes them almost unimaginable to interrupt down naturally; subsequently, they proceed to build up within the atmosphere and in residing organisms.

Several types of PFAS carry completely different toxicities. Giant-molecule fluoropolymers, equivalent to Teflon, are typically thought of inert as they go via the physique with out vital absorption. Nonetheless, smaller-molecule PFAS equivalent to perfluoroalkyl acids can enter the bloodstream and accumulate within the physique.

A rising physique of scientific proof hyperlinks this accumulation to a spread of great well being issues, together with elevated ldl cholesterol, suppressed immune response, and sure kinds of most cancers.

Publicity to PFAS is related with detrimental well being outcomes throughout being pregnant, equivalent to gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, which is a being pregnant complication characterised by hypertension and injury to organs, such because the kidneys and liver. Critically, PFAS can disrupt the placenta’s operate, which is important for the foetus’ well being and survival. It additionally interferes with the hormones important for being pregnant, rising irritation and oxidative stress within the physique. It could possibly subsequently lead to low delivery weight, have an effect on mind improvement and immune operate, and enhance the chance of metabolic issues, weight problems, and studying issues later in life.

Regardless of these documented dangers, the usage of PFAS in cosmetics stays largely undisclosed. A landmark 2021 research, revealed in Environmental Science & Know-how, examined 231 beauty merchandise from the U.S. and Canada and located excessive fluorine ranges, an indicator of PFAS, in over half of them. Of the samples examined, 82% of waterproof mascara, 63% of foundations, and 62% of liquid lipsticks contained measurable PFAS ranges. Critically, in almost all circumstances, these chemical compounds weren’t listed on the product labels.

This discrepancy has triggered authorized challenges. In the USA, a class-action lawsuit was filed towards L’Oréal in 2022, alleging that its waterproof mascara merchandise include PFAS with out disclosure. Previous to the lawsuit, in 2018, L’Oréal introduced that it had begun steadily eliminating all PFAS from its merchandise, with a dedication to realize 100% elimination by the tip of 2024. Nonetheless, no updates have been launched since.

To know the potential relevance for Indian customers, the authors, as a part of the analysis for this commentary, analysed the supply of the merchandise alleged to include vital ranges of PFAS, as said within the lawsuit. The impartial evaluation discovered that a minimum of 26 out of those 41 merchandise, that allegedly include excessive PFAS, are at the moment offered in India. This raises pressing considerations for Indian customers, particularly youngsters and pregnant ladies, although – to be clear – the presence of PFAS within the merchandise offered in India has not been established via impartial scientific testing.

Including to this concern is the regulatory panorama in India. To our information, there are not any particular, overarching rules that prohibit the usage of the broad class of PFAS chemical compounds in beauty merchandise offered within the nation.

As a part of the evaluation for this piece, the authors reached out to 39 magnificence manufacturers and retail platforms in India, together with essentially the most outstanding gamers equivalent to L’Oréal, Lakme (Hindustan Unilever), Estee Lauder, Nykaa, and Tira, inquiring about their actions to mitigate mica use and PFAS contamination. We acquired a substantive response from just one model, Stila Cosmetics, which said that it follows a ‘Provider Code of Conduct’ for mica, and that its merchandise are FDA-compliant concerning PFAS. We acquired solely an auto-response from seven different manufacturers and one retail platform, and no response from the remaining 30.

The worldwide context and an ethical crucial

Not each smoker develops lung most cancers, however smoking unequivocally will increase the chance. The identical logic applies to PFAS publicity. A 2018 report by the Danish Environmental Ministry concluded that publicity to PFAS from cosmetics alone is unlikely to pose a big well being threat. The hazard lies within the accumulation that outcomes from a number of publicity pathways. The potential presence of PFAS in cosmetics is a microcosm of a a lot bigger planetary disaster of accumulating poisonous, artificial chemical compounds.

From Arctic ice to the blood of almost each human on Earth, the presence of PFAS is ubiquitous. Publicity pathways embody meals packaging, non-stick cookware, dairy and livestock, and consuming water. We’re unwitting contributors in an uncontrolled, world chemical experiment, with latest analysis suggesting that the presence of PFAS and different poisonous chemical compounds could already be destabilising the planet on the world scale.

That is the place the query of ethical accountability turns into paramount. In contrast to publicity from doubtlessly important sources, beauty use is pushed by a manufactured best of magnificence, propagated by huge advertising groups using refined psychological instruments. This isn’t an incidental publicity, however a product of behaviour manipulation.

The cosmetics trade doesn’t manufacture merchandise; fairly, it manufactures a super of magnificence that instigates the consumption of its merchandise. This grants it a singular ethical obligation to make sure absolutely the security of the imaginative and prescient it sells, notably in direction of their largest and most weak demographics – youngsters and pregnant ladies.

At the moment, this obligation is being abdicated. The burden of proof rests with scientists and customers to display hurt after a product has already been in the marketplace. It is a perverse reversal of a elementary tenet of public security often known as the ‘precautionary precept.’ We see this precept in motion elsewhere. For example, a pharmaceutical firm is barred from promoting a brand new drug till its security is established via rigorous trials. The onus is on the producer to display security, not on the general public to show hurt.

We contend that this precept should apply to the cosmetics trade and to the retail platforms cashing in on promoting them. The trade should be held to a better customary: to proactively make sure that their merchandise are free from dangerous toxins, not merely react after the presence of poisons is confirmed at public expense. This requires a multi-pronged method: impartial, government-funded research to evaluate the size of contamination in India, the institution of clear regulatory requirements for PFAS in cosmetics, and a legally binding framework that mandates pre-market security assessments by producers.

---

Learn extra: Mica scavenging in Jharkhand destroys lives and atmosphere

---

Trisha Putturaya just lately graduated with a bachelor’s diploma in Environmental Research from Krea College. Chirag Dhara is a local weather and sustainability scientist at Krea College, a lead creator of the Indian Local weather Evaluation Report (2020), and a contributing creator to the IPCC AR6 WG1 Atlas (2021).

As a part of their evaluation on the manufacturers that the authors examined for this text, the authors used on-line buy pages of the merchandise to get their ingredient lists. The analysis and interpretation is predicated solely on info accessible on-line and the authors haven’t straight checked the ingredient labels on the merchandise or performed any testing.

---

 

Banner picture: A consultant picture of beauty merchandise. Picture by Bairavi Arjunan3 by way of Wikimedia Commons (CC-BY-SA-4.0).