When know-how is mentioned, it usually conjures pictures of smooth screens and sensible programs, not potters’ wheels or handlooms. But in India’s artisan financial system, instruments span a large spectrum—from clay and code to synthetic intelligence (AI) and the Web of Issues (IoT).
The New Formal framework helps redefine this variety. It’s a mind-set about how formal and casual programs can work collectively, recognising artisan enterprises as sources of innovation somewhat than outliers. The framework proposes that formal enterprises ought to accommodate informality as a part of their enterprise mannequin. It thus strikes past binary notions of excessive versus low tech to recognise artisan enterprises as innovation hubs. The framework focuses on creating sensible instruments that match the wants of the handmade sector.
For instance, Sasha co-developed compact wooden seasoning programs and decentralised wastewater programs with artisan communities, whereas the Laxmi Asu machine lowered bodily pressure on girls from the Pochampally weaving group. These upgrades respect the rhythm of craft whereas enhancing well-being and productiveness.
Supporting such community-driven innovation is essential to constructing equitable, future-ready provide chains. However as provide chains modernise, some key questions stay: What is feasible? What is beneficial? And what obstacles nonetheless form how know-how is adopted within the handmade sector?
What does adopting new tech within the handmade sector appear to be?
Throughout India’s handmade sector, innovation unfolds not by way of disruption, however by way of considerate adaptation. Craft enterprises are deploying a spread of applied sciences—digital, analogue, frugal, and deep tech—in ways in which align with native ecosystems, data programs, and craft realities.
An illustration of that is the Centre for Pastoralism, which makes use of AI, geotagged pictures, and digital monitoring to doc wool traceability, forestall overgrazing, and seize the environmental logic of pastoralism. Their platform helps regenerative practices and brings visibility to herder data and animal welfare.
Kosha.ai applies IoT and AI to supply safe digital identities, monitoring, and ERP-integrated authentication programs for decentralised artisan enterprises.
Sasha anchors tech in well being, security, and dealing circumstances. In the course of the lockdown, they co-developed ergonomic dwelling workstations for ladies artisans and piloted manufacturing instruments with Truthful Commerce dashboards, inexperienced power inputs, and decentralised wastewater therapy models.
These examples problem the parable that the handmade sector is tech-averse. As a substitute, they reveal improvements grounded in lived realities that work.
Very similar to pure ecosystems, profitable know-how adoption thrives when decentralised. As a substitute of counting on a single, centralised mannequin, every node strengthens the entire system by diversifying options. When every craft group adapts instruments to its native atmosphere, it contributes to shared objectives by way of variety and cooperation somewhat than uniform management.
Optimising as a substitute of maximising allows the sector to recycle data, adapt rapidly, and use sources effectively. This builds resilience that sustains cultural and ecological capital. It additionally helps the handmade sector innovate with out exhausting folks or the planet.


Key concerns and potential challenges
Adopting new know-how within the artisan sector calls for greater than effectivity; it should align with the bigger ecosystem. The objective isn’t simply innovation, but additionally constructing instruments grounded in indigenous data, group wants, and sustainability objectives. Listed here are some concerns for adoption.
- Relevance: Is the know-how tailored to the context?
- Effectivity: Does it cut back time, handbook effort, or useful resource use meaningfully?
- Proof-building: Can it present the place a product originates or comes from, monitor its journey, and ensure that it’s real?
- Sustainability: Does it assist biodiversity, soil regeneration, and animal welfare?
- Social fairness: Are earnings, gender participation, and decision-making enhancing?
- Enterprise viability: Are there measurable features in product high quality, pricing energy, or entry to new markets?
- Inside optimisation: Can the tech improve workflows, enhance monitoring of MIS (administration info programs together with information on orders, manufacturing, funds, and timelines), or Fairtrade compliance (honest pay, protected work, and accountable supplies, with verifiable information)?
- Stakeholder confidence: Is there proof of tangible returns that justify funding and uptake?
Nevertheless, adoption isn’t a easy guidelines.
Applied sciences usually meet some standards whereas compromising others. For instance, coaching modules could construct digital capability however take time away from manufacturing. Barcode tagging guarantees transparency however provides hidden operational load to already stretched workflows. Uniform digital requirements can streamline high quality checks, however they danger flattening craft variations. Subsidised pilots could look enticing at first, but long-term platform charges can drain margins. Digital traceability boosts purchaser confidence however raises questions on information possession. If platforms management information, artisans could lose bargaining energy.
Many artisan enterprises—even skilled social companies—undertake new applied sciences solely after years of ironing out issues and constructing group belief. Even then, gaps persist.
- Value: Regardless of the low entry level of many instruments (for instance, AI subscriptions, Shopify, WhatsApp integrations), the entire tech stack (full set of instruments and platforms required) stays costly for small enterprises.
- Expertise: Discovering inexpensive, expert tech professionals for set-up and upkeep stays tough.
- Readability on return of funding (ROI) : Traceability programs and digital dashboards could provide long-term worth, however advantages will not be at all times instantly seen to producers. Typically, introducing new instruments shifts tasks onto artisans. Entry-level duties resembling photograph documentation or dashboard updates can imply extra unpaid labour. A traceability system may promise future features, however for a craftsperson incomes each day wages, long-term advantages really feel intangible.
- Participation hole: Platforms like GeM, constructed to assist enterprises promote their services or products to authorities organisations, stay onerous to navigate with out guided assist—underscoring the necessity for co-designed, user-friendly digital instruments.
However these challenges are about greater than cash or entry. Adoption is not only technical—it’s emotional (does it match the craft’s rhythm?), financial (does it repay now?), and relational (will this produce worth for my friends/group?).
Sustainable change should start the place artisans are, not the place programs assume they need to be.
What’s going to it take to incentivise know-how adoption?
Slightly than retrofitting generic options to make know-how work for the artisan financial system, we want insurance policies, infrastructure, and incentives that handle the sector’s particular wants.
Precedence actions want to incorporate:
1. Assist for frugal and context-specific innovation
Whereas initiatives resembling Rural Expertise Motion Teams (RuTAGs) and Complete Handicrafts Cluster Growth Scheme exist, their attain has been uneven. That is partly as a result of the handmade sector has traditionally been handled as ‘casual’ and subsequently peripheral to mainstream industrial or tech innovation. Because of this, artisans usually entry assist solely by way of scattered pilot initiatives or nonprofit-led efforts, not sustained policy-backed pipelines. Strengthening these schemes to be extra cluster-specific—tailor-made to native uncooked supplies, manufacturing practices, and market wants—may help scale improvements that already work in smaller pockets.
2. Stronger business–academia linkages
There are promising examples of grassroots–analysis collaboration. For instance, IIT Guwahati’s DigiBunai™ software program digitises conventional weaving patterns to assist weavers adapt to fashionable textile design instruments. Equally, NID and IITs have partnered with RuTAG initiatives to enhance instruments resembling looms, dyeing gear, and ergonomic gadgets. These initiatives present how deep-tech options may be tailored when establishments co-create with artisan communities, although the size remains to be restricted.
3. Digital public infrastructure (DPI) for craft
A craft-focused DPI might imply open platforms the place producer teams can map their stock, entry inexpensive traceability instruments, and promote on equal phrases. A comparable instance is the Open Community for Digital Commerce, which is creating interoperable marketplaces for small retailers. A craft DPI constructed on related ideas would forestall monopolistic platforms from dominating artisan gross sales and guarantee small clusters can plug into bigger markets with out prohibitive charges.
4. Workforce upskilling at a number of ranges
This is able to imply offering digital and tech literacy throughout stakeholder teams—artisans studying easy methods to use digital instruments for design and gross sales; cluster-level organisations gaining abilities in information administration and on-line advertising; and policymakers understanding the moral implications of rising applied sciences resembling AI. With out capability constructing, digital instruments danger turning into extractive somewhat than empowering.
5. Clear coverage frameworks
There’s a want for sustained and clear coverage assist that addresses sure issues.
- Compliance: Guaranteeing artisans will not be excluded resulting from complicated GST, e-invoicing, or digital documentation norms.
- Mental property: Deciding who—the artisan, a collective, or the platform—owns designs generated with AI help.
- Environmental prices: Addressing the power use and e-waste related to digital programs, in order that inexperienced crafts will not be undermined by tech use.
6. Public–non-public partnerships
Such partnerships may help create shared know-how hubs the place artisans entry instruments (for instance, 3D printing and digital design) with out bearing the complete price. In addition they provide an area to check improvements for market readiness whereas embedding safeguards for moral AI use.
When these actions are grounded in artisan realities, know-how can strengthen heritage conservation, increase market entry, and construct future-ready inventive economies.
Trying forward: Forecasting and proposals
As digital adoption accelerates, artisan enterprises should develop inner tech insurance policies—not only for operations, but additionally to mirror their values. Expertise ought to remedy, not obscure, structural challenges. Moral use, privateness, and fairness should be embedded in design and deployment. Listed here are some key concerns transferring ahead.
1. Construct inner readability
Set up a long-term know-how plan to align innovation with enterprise objectives, workforce capability, and group well-being. This prevents reactive adoption and ensures know-how strengthens somewhat than distracts from the enterprise’s mission.
2. Centre the artisan
Commitments to transparency, equitable income sharing, and honest wage compliance should information know-how adoption, simply as they do different enterprise operations. With out this anchor, digital instruments danger deepening precarity as a substitute of supporting livelihoods.
3. Respect variety of fashions
AI integration (or deliberate non-use) should be context-sensitive, not trend-driven. Decrease-carbon craft economies shouldn’t be pressured into high-impact tech with out clear returns. Valuing completely different fashions protects ecological sustainability and honours conventional data that differentiates these crafts in world markets.
4. Perceive hidden prices
From subscription layers to the environmental toll of information centres, know-how comes with actual trade-offs. Mapping these early permits enterprises to keep away from debt traps and make extra sustainable decisions.
5. Incentivise shared studying
Founders fluent in tech ought to mentor lower-maturity gamers, constructing sector resilience. Peer-to-peer sharing reduces duplication of effort and builds collective bargaining power with platforms and distributors.
6. Keep knowledgeable
Monitoring adjoining sectors—resembling {hardware}, open-source instruments, and platform shifts—helps artisan-led companies put together and adapt. This scanning broadens choices and reduces dependence on a single technological pathway.
7. Assist grounded analysis
Area research ought to floor actual wants, not assumptions, guiding extra moral, usable tech design. When artisans form the analysis agenda, the ensuing options have increased uptake and legitimacy.
Good adoption should be community-led, ecologically conscious, and strategically aligned, not simply digitally enabled. To scale context-sensitive tech adoption within the handmade sector, stakeholders should put money into programs that mirror its core strengths: native adaptability, interdependence, and inventive experimentation. This requires nuanced capital methods, blended finance fashions, and affected person funding aligned with the sector’s rhythms and priorities. Infrastructure assist, open innovation networks, and moral digital public items are equally important. Removed from being tech-averse, artisan enterprises are already prototyping for the longer term. To maintain and scale these improvements, they require long-term engagement, not fast fixes or piecemeal grants.
This text builds on insights from the session ‘From low tech to AI: Constructing tech-led efficiencies in craft-value chains’ on the Kula Conclave 2024.
—